In a social media post on Jun 24, AWARE stated that it welcomed the discourse surrounding the saga and appreciated that URA was considering public feedback.
On the artwork, the organisation said the depiction of the samsui woman diverged “significantly from the historical reality of these resilient labourers”.
“In the mural, she is shown holding a cigarette in a glamorous way that does not reflect the gritty and harsh realities faced by the samsui women. This artistic choice may inadvertently perpetuate a male gaze that exoticises female subjects, which could detract from a true appreciation of their contributions.
“While we champion artistic freedom, we also believe it is crucial for artistic interpretations to engage thoughtfully with their subjects and contexts. We encourage a portrayal that more accurately reflects the robust and rugged spirit of the samsui women, ensuring their story is told with the respect and authenticity it deserves.”
AWARE also expressed its concerns that “URA justified its decision by citing public feedback that the woman looked like a prostitute”.
“This statement supports damaging, patriarchal stereotypes about how women should act and look, and is disrespectful to sex workers.”
Speaking to CNA earlier, Dunston said that he was thankful that URA was taking another look at its decision, and he hopes that the authority will allow the mural to remain as it is now.
“It’s important that the public feedback (URA uses) to regulate images seen in public be more even-handed (or at least less offensive than the art it’s criticising) and that enforcement of policy regarding art, in particular, be more nuanced and geared towards supporting art and discussion,” he said.
